Press Releases

WASHINGTON, DC – Frustrated with a lack of intelligence concerning President Obama’s plan to relocate terrorists held at Guantanamo Bay, Cuba to the mainland, U.S. Senator Pat Roberts (R-Kan.) today demanded answers from the Secretary of Defense about the consequences to national security of such a move. Roberts is a former chairman of the Senate Select Committee on Intelligence. Audio of Senator Roberts’ remarks can be found below.

“There has been no comprehensive intelligence analysis of security risks or alleged benefits to the American people should detainees held at Guantanamo be relocated to the mainland,” Roberts said. “How can the Administration decide that moving these terrorists is in our best interests if we do not have an analysis of the threats? With both the American people and the Congress opposed to this executive action, how is the President reaching this decision?”

U.S. Attorney General Loretta Lynch yesterday testified before the House Judiciary Committee and said, “With respect to individuals being transferred to the United State, the law currently does not allow for that. And that is not, as I am aware of, going to be contemplated given the legal prescriptions.”

“The Congress has banned the transfer of detainees, the American people, and more especially Kansans are opposed to the effort, President Obama’s own Attorney General says that it would be against the law, and there has been no comprehensive intelligence analysis of what this executive action would do to American communities or to our overall war against terror,” Roberts said. “Because neither national security nor the wishes of the American people have determined this course of action, we can only conclude that closing GITMO is to fulfill a campaign promise and add to the President’s alleged legacy. And it is a mistake.”

The following is the text of a letter dated today that Senator Roberts sent to U.S. Secretary of Defense Ash Carter:

The Honorable Ash Carter
Secretary of Defense
Department of Defense
1000 Defense Pentagon
Washington, DC  20301-1000
 
 
Dear Mr. Secretary:
 
 I write today regarding the Department’s ongoing plan to relocate enemy combatants currently detained at Joint Task Force Guantanamo Bay, Cuba.
 
As former Chairman of the Senate Intelligence Committee, I understand the critical importance of analytical data. With that in mind, I write to ask if an intelligence assessment has been done in conjunction with the site surveys recently conducted by Under Secretary Christine Wormuth’s team. To date, the Senate Intelligence Committee reports no comprehensive intelligence product exists in relation to the transfer of Guantanamo Bay detainees to the mainland.
 
It is my understanding that Fort Leavenworth has been evaluated four times since the beginning of the Global War on Terror. Three times, it has been deemed unacceptable as an option. In speaking with those very familiar with the installation and its correctional facilities, it appears nothing has changed. The current facilities remain ill-equipped and without capacity to house the detainees in question. Additionally, Fort Leavenworth’s location remains undesirable for use due to its close proximity to the Missouri river, railroad, county road, and working farm land. These impediments create difficulties for constructing the necessary stand-off areas for incarceration of both military inmates and enemy combatants. What is the Department’s rational for evaluating Fort Leavenworth a fourth time? Have there been intelligence products regarding previous site evaluations at Fort Leavenworth?
 
Of greatest importance is the safety and security of the communities surrounding the fort, which include Lansing, Leavenworth, and Kansas City. The Administration has argued that Guantanamo is a recruiting tool for terrorists. Is there intelligence to support that argument? What assessment has been done to reflect that Guantanamo has increased terrorism recruitment, but detainment in the United States would decrease recruitment? Is there any empirical data to support the Administration’s argument that national security threats will decrease if enemy combatants are held in the United States?
 
As you know, I am strongly opposed to moving detainees from Guantanamo to the United States, more especially to Fort Leavenworth, Kansas. I have consistently expressed my staunch objection since the topic was first raised by this Administration in 2009. I truly appreciate your leadership at the Department. I respectfully ask that if these intelligence assessments have not been done, that you insist the Department do so before considering moving one detainee to the United States.
 
Thank you for your time and attention to my request. I look forward to your reply.
 

Earlier this month Senator Roberts started an online petition to allow Kansans to voice their opposition to President Obama’s attempts to close Guantanamo Bay by Executive Order and bring terrorists to Kansas or anywhere else in the United States. Those interested may sign the petition at: https://www.roberts.senate.gov/take-action-gitmo/

Senator Roberts has also recorded a PSA encouraging Kansans to sign the petition. To download the 60 second PSA click here. For longer audio click here.

Roberts has been an outspoken opponent of closing the United States’ current detainment facilities due to the high security risks and economic costs.  Roberts has actively fought the Obama Administration’s efforts to transfer Guantanamo detainees to the mainland, particularly to Ft. Leavenworth. Roberts placed a hold on the administration’s nominee for Secretary of the Army in August. In 2009, he fought the administration, including placing legislative holds on nominees, which successfully prevented its plan to consider housing detainees at Ft. Leavenworth.  

 

-30-

 

Related Files